Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 621 - 630 of 4808 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Double Batang Batang Sumenep.

COURT OF APPEALS
to double that amount because, according to the submission, New Horizon rejected an offer of settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89385 - 2012-11-19

[PDF] Laurie Briggs v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
The circuit court also doubled the costs and awarded interest under WIS. STAT. § 807.01 (1995-96) 2 because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15448 - 2017-09-21

Laurie Briggs v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
. ¶2 The circuit court also doubled the costs and awarded interest under Wis. Stat. § 807.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15448 - 2005-03-31

State v. Edward J. Parker
, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he was subjected to double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11493 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - November 2011
to double damages from the defendants under Wis. Stat. § 26.21(1). Some background: Jeffrey Knaack
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72927 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Sveum
in which he argued that two of his convictions violate the double jeopardy clause because violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3539 - 2017-09-19

Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
of one of his mobile homes to Kenneth and Linda Longsine for $6500. After invoking the double damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2585 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael A. Sveum
the denial of a postconviction motion in which he argued that two of his convictions violate the double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3539 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
violation of his due process and double jeopardy rights. We conclude the court properly modified Boyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62842 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the court should consider Kilbourn’s request for reconsideration to constitute double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122802 - 2014-10-01