Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 29361 for er.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 29361 for er.
[PDF]
NOTICE
erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea without an evidentiary hearing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52100 - 2014-09-15
erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea without an evidentiary hearing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52100 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Miguel Angel Santana-Lopez
–874 (Ct. App. 1995). 3 Santana-Lopez does not argue on appeal that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15279 - 2017-09-21
–874 (Ct. App. 1995). 3 Santana-Lopez does not argue on appeal that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“the County”), following a jury trial. Derousseau argues the circuit court erred by failing to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218473 - 2018-08-30
“the County”), following a jury trial. Derousseau argues the circuit court erred by failing to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218473 - 2018-08-30
State v. Scott A. Heimermann
that the trial court erred when it declined to issue this writ. Although Heimermann was discharged from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10013 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it declined to issue this writ. Although Heimermann was discharged from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10013 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
denying his request for a new trial. Whaley's contention is that the trial court erred because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10113 - 2005-03-31
denying his request for a new trial. Whaley's contention is that the trial court erred because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10113 - 2005-03-31
Town of Sugar Creek v. City of Elkhorn
and that the circuit court erred in relying upon the “zone of economic interest” theory propounded by the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14439 - 2005-03-31
and that the circuit court erred in relying upon the “zone of economic interest” theory propounded by the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Heimermann
-2- The context of our discussion is Scott A. Heimermann's claim that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10013 - 2017-09-19
-2- The context of our discussion is Scott A. Heimermann's claim that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10013 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
, Cincinnati Insurance Company. The Murphys claim: (1) the trial court erred in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27841 - 2007-01-22
, Cincinnati Insurance Company. The Murphys claim: (1) the trial court erred in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27841 - 2007-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; (2) the trial court erred in summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32491 - 2008-04-21
: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; (2) the trial court erred in summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32491 - 2008-04-21
William Fifer, Sr. v. Lyle A. Dix
but that it erred in dismissing the statutory claim against Dix. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15704 - 2005-03-31
but that it erred in dismissing the statutory claim against Dix. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15704 - 2005-03-31