Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 63649 for records.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 63649 for records.
State v. Johnny Lee Griffin
the victim witness surcharge because the court had not ordered it on the record at sentencing. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13555 - 2005-03-31
the victim witness surcharge because the court had not ordered it on the record at sentencing. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13555 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106387 - 2014-01-05
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106387 - 2014-01-05
State v. Raymond T. Golden
. On the basis of the no merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9901 - 2005-03-31
. On the basis of the no merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9901 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Johnny Lee Griffin
, to return to him the victim witness surcharge because the court had not ordered it on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13555 - 2017-09-21
, to return to him the victim witness surcharge because the court had not ordered it on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dane Co. DHS v. Susan P. S.
). The key issue is whether the record shows “an identifiable problem or Nos. 2005AP3155 2005AP3156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24948 - 2017-09-21
). The key issue is whether the record shows “an identifiable problem or Nos. 2005AP3155 2005AP3156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
March 15, 2012
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79738 - 2014-09-15
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
April 20, 2012
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81510 - 2014-09-15
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81510 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191743 - 2017-09-21
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191743 - 2017-09-21
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
, because the circuit court relied on inaccurate information about Tiepelman's criminal record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08
, because the circuit court relied on inaccurate information about Tiepelman's criminal record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08
Randal J. Hellenbrand v. Irwin A. Goodman
eliminating any “need to comply with the notice of [claim] statute.” We disagree. The record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4725 - 2005-03-31
eliminating any “need to comply with the notice of [claim] statute.” We disagree. The record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4725 - 2005-03-31