Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6231 - 6240 of 69083 for as he.

[PDF] NOTICE
counsel. He argues that his trial counsel was constitutionally deficient for conceding guilt on two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32223 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25

State v. Antwan Battles
to §§ 943.32(1)(a) & (2), 940.03, 939.05 and 939.32, Stats. He claims that: (1) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
information from dispatch that this man was “not on his medication and that he was very anti-law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120938 - 2014-09-09

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
information was used at sentencing; (3) the prosecutor breached the plea agreement and therefore he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27500 - 2006-12-18

State v. Harold Richard Nero
him after he pled guilty.[2] He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7577 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. was released from jail, he lived with one of R.Z.’s relatives for a week or two. He then left Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160645 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
his judgment of conviction. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222930 - 2018-10-18

Clay Rich v. Kenneth Morgan
it did. See id. Rich's first contention is that he was denied his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10778 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that he is dangerous. He also asserts that his appeal is not moot because even though he was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12