Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6241 - 6250 of 69083 for as he.
Search results 6241 - 6250 of 69083 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. William D.H.
) The defendant had not attained the age of eighteen years at the time he or she allegedly possessed a dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7059 - 2017-09-20
) The defendant had not attained the age of eighteen years at the time he or she allegedly possessed a dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7059 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is dangerous. He also asserts that his appeal is not moot because even though he was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12
that he is dangerous. He also asserts that his appeal is not moot because even though he was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contends that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because he did not understand the effects of read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278077 - 2020-08-13
contends that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because he did not understand the effects of read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278077 - 2020-08-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 941.29(2) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10). 1 He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110343 - 2017-09-21
contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 941.29(2) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10). 1 He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110343 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerold A. Haut
was ineffective because he advised Haut to plead guilty rather than go to trial with an adequate provocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
was ineffective because he advised Haut to plead guilty rather than go to trial with an adequate provocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 941.30(2). ¶3 At the fact-finding hearing, eighteen-year-old Juwane Brown testified he dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97907 - 2013-06-10
. § 941.30(2). ¶3 At the fact-finding hearing, eighteen-year-old Juwane Brown testified he dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97907 - 2013-06-10
State v. Harold Richard Nero
him after he pled guilty.[2] He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7578 - 2005-03-31
him after he pled guilty.[2] He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7578 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Richard Nero
him after he pled guilty.[2] He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7576 - 2005-03-31
him after he pled guilty.[2] He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7576 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Richard Nero
him after he pled guilty.[2] He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7575 - 2005-03-31
him after he pled guilty.[2] He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7575 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James J. Kaufman v. Judy P. Smith
for review of two other prison disciplinary decisions. He claims that WIS. STAT. No. 02-0917 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5120 - 2017-09-19
for review of two other prison disciplinary decisions. He claims that WIS. STAT. No. 02-0917 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5120 - 2017-09-19