Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6251 - 6260 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 6251 - 6260 of 83455 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Malcolm J. Muller
that the search of his vehicle violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18820 - 2017-09-21
that the search of his vehicle violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18820 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randolph S. Guenterberg
as a result of a warrantless search of his home and his vehicle.[1] For purposes of appeal, the searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9030 - 2005-03-31
as a result of a warrantless search of his home and his vehicle.[1] For purposes of appeal, the searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9030 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
through an internet search. However, the undisputed facts establish that other than Black, only one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561633 - 2022-09-01
through an internet search. However, the undisputed facts establish that other than Black, only one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561633 - 2022-09-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case at bar. Other searches will no doubt implicate other factors that may assist in the inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691727 - 2023-08-17
of the case at bar. Other searches will no doubt implicate other factors that may assist in the inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691727 - 2023-08-17
State v. McKinley Williams
that Hoyer represents a case in which the court conformed the law relating to the state constitutional search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11399 - 2005-03-31
that Hoyer represents a case in which the court conformed the law relating to the state constitutional search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11399 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. McKinley Williams
the exception to non-warrant cases. See 1 Wayne R. LaFave, SEARCH AND SEIZURE, ยง 1.3(g), at 92-96 (3d ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11399 - 2017-09-19
the exception to non-warrant cases. See 1 Wayne R. LaFave, SEARCH AND SEIZURE, ยง 1.3(g), at 92-96 (3d ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11399 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to do a protective search of the car Ware was driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132234 - 2017-09-21
because the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to do a protective search of the car Ware was driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132234 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his suppression motion because the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to do a protective search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132234 - 2014-12-29
by denying his suppression motion because the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to do a protective search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132234 - 2014-12-29
State v. Ronald L. Saari
obtained during a warrantless search of a motel room. Because we conclude that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12227 - 2005-03-31
obtained during a warrantless search of a motel room. Because we conclude that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
as a co-tenant. LaPere argues that Couillard lacked authority to consent to a search because she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28278 - 2014-09-15
as a co-tenant. LaPere argues that Couillard lacked authority to consent to a search because she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28278 - 2014-09-15