Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 631 - 640 of 60202 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 631 - 640 of 60202 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
WI APP 39
7 Kapinus moved for summary judgment on all claims except for the claim of trespass, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528487 - 2022-08-10
7 Kapinus moved for summary judgment on all claims except for the claim of trespass, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528487 - 2022-08-10
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
to their property, on Eckendorf’s property. Rae Best, the Austins’ predecessor in interest, granted by deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
to their property, on Eckendorf’s property. Rae Best, the Austins’ predecessor in interest, granted by deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
, granted by deed the thirty-foot-wide easement. The grant specifically describes the area in metes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2391 - 2017-09-19
, granted by deed the thirty-foot-wide easement. The grant specifically describes the area in metes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2391 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Pearl A. Powers v. Thomas F. Powers
. The undisputed facts are that on April 13, 1990, Thomas and Pearl executed a quitclaim deed of the residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11947 - 2017-09-21
. The undisputed facts are that on April 13, 1990, Thomas and Pearl executed a quitclaim deed of the residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Alex NMI Skoullou
was damaged in an amount less than $1000. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11800 - 2014-09-15
was damaged in an amount less than $1000. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11800 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
detail below, the court concluded that the deeds are ambiguous on this issue and resolved that ambiguity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101610 - 2013-09-04
detail below, the court concluded that the deeds are ambiguous on this issue and resolved that ambiguity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101610 - 2013-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the deeds are ambiguous on this issue and resolved that ambiguity based on evidence extrinsic to the deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101610 - 2017-09-21
that the deeds are ambiguous on this issue and resolved that ambiguity based on evidence extrinsic to the deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101610 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. According to the Knotts’ deed, they own an L-shaped property. The “chain of deeds for the YGR property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920518 - 2025-02-26
. According to the Knotts’ deed, they own an L-shaped property. The “chain of deeds for the YGR property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920518 - 2025-02-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, Dillenburg acquired the other parcel, Shawano County Tax Parcel 024-29220-0010, via a guardian’s deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66677 - 2011-06-27
, Dillenburg acquired the other parcel, Shawano County Tax Parcel 024-29220-0010, via a guardian’s deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66677 - 2011-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
acquired the other parcel, Shawano County Tax Parcel 024-29220-0010, via a guardian’s deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66677 - 2014-09-15
acquired the other parcel, Shawano County Tax Parcel 024-29220-0010, via a guardian’s deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66677 - 2014-09-15