Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6301 - 6310 of 64723 for b's.
Search results 6301 - 6310 of 64723 for b's.
State v. Charles R. Wincek
relief. The trial court adjudged Wincek guilty of theft by a contractor, contrary to § 943.20(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2005-03-31
relief. The trial court adjudged Wincek guilty of theft by a contractor, contrary to § 943.20(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2005-03-31
Rodney Rowsey v. Kenneth Morgan
for the hearing, causing prejudice to the petitioner at the hearing. b. Counsel had difficulty staying awake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12614 - 2005-03-31
for the hearing, causing prejudice to the petitioner at the hearing. b. Counsel had difficulty staying awake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12614 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Earl A. Drew
of a child is a Class B felony, which was punishable by up to twenty years in prison. Section 939.50(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8976 - 2017-09-19
of a child is a Class B felony, which was punishable by up to twenty years in prison. Section 939.50(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8976 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc. d/b/a UW Health Physicians
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29180 - 2007-05-23
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc. d/b/a UW Health Physicians
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29180 - 2007-05-23
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M.
. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship” means the acceptance and exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7368 - 2017-09-20
. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship” means the acceptance and exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7368 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the discovery demand. L.C. moved to exclude the evidence per WIS. STAT. § 938.31(3)(b). 3 The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168665 - 2017-09-21
with the discovery demand. L.C. moved to exclude the evidence per WIS. STAT. § 938.31(3)(b). 3 The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168665 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James W. Pusel
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Pusel raises the following issues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9575 - 2017-09-19
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Pusel raises the following issues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9575 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in an amended information to reflect that the case was brought under § 948.025(1)(b). 3 Prior to entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30960 - 2014-09-15
in an amended information to reflect that the case was brought under § 948.025(1)(b). 3 Prior to entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30960 - 2014-09-15
State v. T.J. International, Inc.
of an employment site” that affects a specified number of employees. Wis. Stat. § 109.07(1)(b). The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2005-03-31
of an employment site” that affects a specified number of employees. Wis. Stat. § 109.07(1)(b). The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)(b) (2013-14). 1 Williams’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149172 - 2017-09-21
)(b) (2013-14). 1 Williams’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149172 - 2017-09-21