Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6301 - 6310 of 65142 for b's.
Search results 6301 - 6310 of 65142 for b's.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that the trafficking was done “for the purposes of a commercial sex act.” See WIS. STAT. § 940.302(2)(a)1.b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1117225 - 2026-05-13
that the trafficking was done “for the purposes of a commercial sex act.” See WIS. STAT. § 940.302(2)(a)1.b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1117225 - 2026-05-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that the trafficking was done “for the purposes of a commercial sex act.” See WIS. STAT. § 940.302(2)(a)1.b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1117225 - 2026-05-13
that the trafficking was done “for the purposes of a commercial sex act.” See WIS. STAT. § 940.302(2)(a)1.b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1117225 - 2026-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Z. P.
at dispositional or postdispositional hearings. See WIS. STAT. § 938.299(4)(b). Instead, the statute directs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4425 - 2017-09-19
at dispositional or postdispositional hearings. See WIS. STAT. § 938.299(4)(b). Instead, the statute directs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4425 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and in furtherance of the conspiracy.” Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4)(b)5. A coconspirator’s statement “is in furtherance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131995 - 2014-12-22
and in furtherance of the conspiracy.” Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4)(b)5. A coconspirator’s statement “is in furtherance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131995 - 2014-12-22
State v. Thomas Z. P.
hearings. See Wis. Stat. § 938.299(4)(b). Instead, the statute directs that the court “shall admit all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4426 - 2005-03-31
hearings. See Wis. Stat. § 938.299(4)(b). Instead, the statute directs that the court “shall admit all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4426 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas Z. P.
hearings. See Wis. Stat. § 938.299(4)(b). Instead, the statute directs that the court “shall admit all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4425 - 2005-03-31
hearings. See Wis. Stat. § 938.299(4)(b). Instead, the statute directs that the court “shall admit all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4425 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. M. Joanne Wolf
of altering a public record with intent to defraud, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.38(1)(b), a Class C felony
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16436 - 2005-03-31
of altering a public record with intent to defraud, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.38(1)(b), a Class C felony
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
years’ extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(1)(b) (2003-04) 3 (classifying first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26400 - 2017-09-21
years’ extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(1)(b) (2003-04) 3 (classifying first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26400 - 2017-09-21
Michael J. McCullough v. Leonard J. Lewensohn
/b/a Business Resource Associates and Fleischmann Supply Co., Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12200 - 2005-03-31
/b/a Business Resource Associates and Fleischmann Supply Co., Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12200 - 2005-03-31
Waukesha County v. Albert A. Tadych
was appointed because section 75.521(12)(b), WIS. STATS., required the same.” Initially, the County argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7761 - 2005-03-31
was appointed because section 75.521(12)(b), WIS. STATS., required the same.” Initially, the County argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7761 - 2005-03-31