Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 63921 - 63930 of 68575 for law.
Search results 63921 - 63930 of 68575 for law.
COURT OF APPEALS
the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, used a demonstrated rational process, and reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51802 - 2010-07-13
the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, used a demonstrated rational process, and reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51802 - 2010-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
facts that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27779 - 2007-01-16
facts that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27779 - 2007-01-16
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Urquhart Companies
WIS. STAT. § 803.09(1) is a question of law we decide de novo. Armada Broadcasting, Inc. v. Stirn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19623 - 2017-09-21
WIS. STAT. § 803.09(1) is a question of law we decide de novo. Armada Broadcasting, Inc. v. Stirn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19623 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald J. Matta
and with lawful authority; and (3) the defendant knowingly obstructed the officer (that is, the defendant knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7835 - 2005-03-31
and with lawful authority; and (3) the defendant knowingly obstructed the officer (that is, the defendant knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7835 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony D.B.
of law. We review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13678 - 2005-03-31
of law. We review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13678 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
personal jurisdiction is a question of law that we review independently. See Kopke, 245 Wis. 2d 396, ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177782 - 2017-09-21
personal jurisdiction is a question of law that we review independently. See Kopke, 245 Wis. 2d 396, ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177782 - 2017-09-21
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
is not. The commission's "discretion" in this case is to decide a question of law: Are auxiliary services "in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9994 - 2005-03-31
is not. The commission's "discretion" in this case is to decide a question of law: Are auxiliary services "in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
back to comply with the current zoning laws and the actual cost of the razing. But I do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808040 - 2024-05-31
back to comply with the current zoning laws and the actual cost of the razing. But I do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808040 - 2024-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel claim presents a mixed question of fact and law.” State v. Pico, 2018 WI 66, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614483 - 2023-01-25
assistance of counsel claim presents a mixed question of fact and law.” State v. Pico, 2018 WI 66, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614483 - 2023-01-25
COURT OF APPEALS
“examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, used a demonstrated rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48121 - 2010-03-17
“examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, used a demonstrated rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48121 - 2010-03-17