Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64061 - 64070 of 83733 for simple case search.
Search results 64061 - 64070 of 83733 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
are consensual. I disagree. ¶5 This case presents a question of statutory interpretation, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57072 - 2010-11-23
are consensual. I disagree. ¶5 This case presents a question of statutory interpretation, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57072 - 2010-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the postconviction motion and briefs, be sealed.” The court further ordered that “the case be administratively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
, and the postconviction motion and briefs, be sealed.” The court further ordered that “the case be administratively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS
Escalona-Naranjo is on point and dispositive. In that case, Escalona-Naranjo was convicted of crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33619 - 2008-08-04
Escalona-Naranjo is on point and dispositive. In that case, Escalona-Naranjo was convicted of crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33619 - 2008-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS
requires the application of constitutional principles to the facts of the case,” which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33803 - 2008-08-20
requires the application of constitutional principles to the facts of the case,” which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33803 - 2008-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP939 2 review of Foulk’s brief and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
. No. 2022AP939 2 review of Foulk’s brief and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116161 - 2014-07-08
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116161 - 2014-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. We explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. We explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
State v. Craig Chenal
be appropriate, in the vast majority of cases, this one included, such determinations are unassailable. In fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3745 - 2005-03-31
be appropriate, in the vast majority of cases, this one included, such determinations are unassailable. In fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3745 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Geneva v. Adrienne E. Cox
or, in the alternative, to suppress evidence stating: “In this particular case Officer Giovannoni obviously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11731 - 2017-09-20
or, in the alternative, to suppress evidence stating: “In this particular case Officer Giovannoni obviously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11731 - 2017-09-20
State v. Morris F Clement
: [D]oes the state have the burden of proof in this case? [SPECIAL PROSECUTOR]: Yes. The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19476 - 2005-09-06
: [D]oes the state have the burden of proof in this case? [SPECIAL PROSECUTOR]: Yes. The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19476 - 2005-09-06