Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6411 - 6420 of 12913 for prosecuting.

COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment, “suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56787 - 2010-11-15

J. W. v. B. B., M.D.
prosecutions where, in order to prevail, the State generally must prove that a defendant’s illegal conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18299 - 2005-07-06

State v. Richard N. Konkol
, that this isn’t a defense that is new to the prosecution, and whether [the district attorney] was going to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4273 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 79
that the prosecution turn over material exculpatory evidence. Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 57 (1988); State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114193 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Brandon J. Matke
). The present action began as a misdemeanor prosecution for fourth-offense OMVWI but ended with Matke’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6804 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Harold Merryfield
violated the bond conditions imposed in a prior prosecution, only a misdemeanor charge was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13907 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
to prosecutions under WIS. STAT. § 940.225. No. 2008AP733-CR 8 ¶14 As comment 4 to WIS JI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34645 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Harold Merryfield
violated the bond conditions imposed in a prior prosecution, only a misdemeanor charge was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13905 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Scott Heimermann
. The following are affirmative defenses to prosecution under this section which mitigate the offense to 2nd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8548 - 2017-09-19

Larry Lykins v. Virgil H. Steinhorst
to prosecute all offenses committed by or against Indians on Indian lands "in accordance with state law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8380 - 2005-03-31