Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6421 - 6430 of 63197 for records.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237166 - 2019-03-13

[PDF] State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
on informal discovery. The record shows no basis for challenging counsels' decisions on these matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9586 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100720 - 2013-08-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123372 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101791 - 2017-09-21

Jonathan P. Cole v. Gerald A. Berge
methodology if he prevails on his claim because the State does not assert, nor does the record show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4852 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP1101-CRNM 2 Discua-Bados’s response. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480024 - 2022-02-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of his right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211209 - 2018-04-17

[PDF] State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
on informal discovery. The record shows no basis for challenging counsels' decisions on these matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9587 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259637 - 2020-05-06