Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64291 - 64300 of 68988 for had.

State v. Lance L. Reed
such a test. The trial court concluded that while there had been some conversation about blood tests versus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5184 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that he did not give anyone permission to take his tractor, and Sugden never claimed to have had Chambers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98118 - 2013-06-12

COURT OF APPEALS
, 101 Wis. 2d 472, 494, 305 N.W.2d 89, 100 (1981). The State is correct in its assessment: “Perez had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60547 - 2011-02-28

Robert A. Kerbell v. Otter Creek Builders, LLC
requiring it to repurchase the condominium for the sum of $196,379.53. Kerbell, who had prepared for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2104 - 2005-03-31

County of Vilas v. David R. Melstrand
a license. Melstrand also said that he did not need a driver’s license and had caselaw to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4346 - 2005-03-31

State v. David R. Melstrand
a license. Melstrand also said that he did not need a driver’s license and had caselaw to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4345 - 2005-03-31

Thomas J. McPhetridge, Sr. v. Christine A. McPhetridge
A. Owens, were divorced in 1997. The parties had two minor children. McPhetridge failed to make court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20104 - 2007-06-04

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael H. Grady
in fact, he had entered appearances, filed pleadings, and appeared in court in at least 20 cases since his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16805 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added oral argument dates for October 2012
. Whether the requestor had a right to receive the records based upon an attorney-client relationship
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85725 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
was discretionary and who previously had provided a DNA sample in another case? Should the court overrule
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215326 - 2018-07-06