Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6431 - 6440 of 63536 for records.
Search results 6431 - 6440 of 63536 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237166 - 2019-03-13
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237166 - 2019-03-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131566 - 2017-09-21
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131566 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Choice W. E.
-1767 -3- We do not believe the record supports that conclusion but is an educated, intuitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19
-1767 -3- We do not believe the record supports that conclusion but is an educated, intuitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19
Gary Sutrick v. Myles Wellnitz
. Kim Pritzlaff, a surveyor, testified as an expert. He stated that there were no records concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10291 - 2005-03-31
. Kim Pritzlaff, a surveyor, testified as an expert. He stated that there were no records concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10291 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recounted Patrick’s lengthy juvenile and adult record to the circuit court, incorrectly stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98003 - 2014-09-15
recounted Patrick’s lengthy juvenile and adult record to the circuit court, incorrectly stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98003 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98169 - 2014-09-15
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98169 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92739 - 2013-02-11
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92739 - 2013-02-11
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
might reasonably waive the preliminary hearing and rely on informal discovery. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9587 - 2005-03-31
might reasonably waive the preliminary hearing and rely on informal discovery. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9587 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 US. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96657 - 2014-09-15
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 US. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96657 - 2014-09-15