Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6461 - 6470 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 6461 - 6470 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment present questions of law that we review de novo. See Hull v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144842 - 2015-07-20
of summary judgment present questions of law that we review de novo. See Hull v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144842 - 2015-07-20
State v. Carolyn A. Sullivan
review de novo. Krier, 165 Wis.2d at 676, 478 N.W.2d at 65. The relevant factual findings in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13952 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Krier, 165 Wis.2d at 676, 478 N.W.2d at 65. The relevant factual findings in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13952 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85649 - 2012-07-31
performance was deficient and prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85649 - 2012-07-31
State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
is de novo. See State v. Fields, 2001 WI App 297, ¶5, 249 Wis. 2d 292, 296, 638 N.W.2d 897, 899. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26
is de novo. See State v. Fields, 2001 WI App 297, ¶5, 249 Wis. 2d 292, 296, 638 N.W.2d 897, 899. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
and ordered Hambly to reimburse Lewis $300 for costs. Hambly appeals. ¶4 This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85981 - 2012-08-14
and ordered Hambly to reimburse Lewis $300 for costs. Hambly appeals. ¶4 This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85981 - 2012-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017776 - 2025-10-02
a court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017776 - 2025-10-02
[PDF]
Andrew S. Zieve v. Ness
.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). In summary judgment cases, we review the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9361 - 2017-09-19
.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). In summary judgment cases, we review the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9361 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ambrose Groshek v. Dale D. Miller
judgment is de novo, see Green Spring Farms v. No. 97-2256 3 Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12839 - 2017-09-21
judgment is de novo, see Green Spring Farms v. No. 97-2256 3 Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12839 - 2017-09-21
County of Rock v. Gregory J. Sendelbach
de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827, 832 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9306 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827, 832 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9306 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William A. Brown
. § 346.65 and raises a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Delaney, 2003 WI 9, ¶12, 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6513 - 2017-09-19
. § 346.65 and raises a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Delaney, 2003 WI 9, ¶12, 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6513 - 2017-09-19