Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64921 - 64930 of 69038 for had.
Search results 64921 - 64930 of 69038 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Dennis C. Tevik
, an officer read him a standard Informing the Accused form. One paragraph, however, had been modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9841 - 2017-09-19
, an officer read him a standard Informing the Accused form. One paragraph, however, had been modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9841 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that had been in effect for four years. ¶8 A new factor is a fact or set of facts that was “‘not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116991 - 2017-09-21
that had been in effect for four years. ¶8 A new factor is a fact or set of facts that was “‘not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116991 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
brief to the parties, noting that no respondent’s brief had been filed as required under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767738 - 2024-02-22
brief to the parties, noting that no respondent’s brief had been filed as required under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767738 - 2024-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
brief to the parties, noting that no respondent’s brief had been filed as required under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767738 - 2024-02-22
brief to the parties, noting that no respondent’s brief had been filed as required under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767738 - 2024-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the complaint— manufacturing/delivering between five and fifteen grams of cocaine—the drugs in question had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30
in the complaint— manufacturing/delivering between five and fifteen grams of cocaine—the drugs in question had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had either already been decided or were “too late.” Campbell moved for reconsideration, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860611 - 2024-10-10
had either already been decided or were “too late.” Campbell moved for reconsideration, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860611 - 2024-10-10
Dino L. Mcquay v. Gary R. Mccaughtry
, in that he had not heard the exchange between McQuay and the officer. McQuay also testified. The committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7984 - 2005-03-31
, in that he had not heard the exchange between McQuay and the officer. McQuay also testified. The committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7984 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court had not personally signed it. The motion was denied and Williams did not appeal.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28
that the trial court had not personally signed it. The motion was denied and Williams did not appeal.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of intimate parts,” which had previously been undefined. See § 948.01(1t); 2019 Wis. Act 16. However
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551897 - 2022-08-10
of intimate parts,” which had previously been undefined. See § 948.01(1t); 2019 Wis. Act 16. However
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551897 - 2022-08-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and states the reason on the record.” WIS. STAT. § 973.20(1r). In determining whether the court had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186953 - 2017-09-21
and states the reason on the record.” WIS. STAT. § 973.20(1r). In determining whether the court had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186953 - 2017-09-21