Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 651 - 660 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Cameron R.P. v. Jennifer P.
, at a hearing two months later, the court granted the state’s motion to dismiss the charge. At that hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15722 - 2005-03-31
, at a hearing two months later, the court granted the state’s motion to dismiss the charge. At that hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15722 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cameron R.P. v. Jennifer P.
charge. However, at a hearing two months later, the court granted the state’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15722 - 2017-09-21
charge. However, at a hearing two months later, the court granted the state’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15722 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2014. ¶3 Although the parties agreed to joint custody and equal shared placement of E. O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164379 - 2017-09-21
2014. ¶3 Although the parties agreed to joint custody and equal shared placement of E. O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164379 - 2017-09-21
Christopher A. M. v. Trudie T.
litem’s recommendation that joint physical placement and custody was in Joseph’s best interest. In sum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4832 - 2005-03-31
litem’s recommendation that joint physical placement and custody was in Joseph’s best interest. In sum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Motion of Hunter, Zabel, and Persa for leave to file reply in support of motion for
. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF INTERVENORS-PETITIONERS LISA HUNTER, JACOB ZABEL
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21ap1450_020924motion.pdf - 2024-02-09
. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF INTERVENORS-PETITIONERS LISA HUNTER, JACOB ZABEL
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21ap1450_020924motion.pdf - 2024-02-09
[PDF]
Xiaoxia Yu v. Jiayou Zhang
, as the parties are now in joint legal custody. Therefore, Zhang’s scenario—that the children are more needy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11209 - 2017-09-19
, as the parties are now in joint legal custody. Therefore, Zhang’s scenario—that the children are more needy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11209 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
a custody order for Clayton, with joint custody but primary placement with Melissa. In August 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45782 - 2014-09-15
a custody order for Clayton, with joint custody but primary placement with Melissa. In August 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45782 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a custody order for Clayton, with joint custody but primary placement with Melissa. In August 2004, Melissa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45782 - 2010-01-13
a custody order for Clayton, with joint custody but primary placement with Melissa. In August 2004, Melissa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45782 - 2010-01-13
Linda M. Goberville v. Brad J. Goberville
placement hearing, the family court commissioner awarded joint legal custody to Linda and Brad and ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7650 - 2005-03-31
placement hearing, the family court commissioner awarded joint legal custody to Linda and Brad and ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Linda M. Goberville v. Brad J. Goberville
to recommend joint legal custody at that time. He added that he believed Linda had a better support system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7650 - 2017-09-19
to recommend joint legal custody at that time. He added that he believed Linda had a better support system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7650 - 2017-09-19