Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 63665 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] Michael Martin Burds v. Kathy Ann Walsh-Burds
, separated in March 1993 and divorced on June 15, 1995. They agreed to joint custody of their nine-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10892 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] 2024AP001872 - 2024-09-20 Court Order (Motion for Oral Argument)
the motion of petitioner-appellant, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., requesting oral argument in this matter
/supreme/docs/2024AP001872order.pdf - 2024-09-23

[PDF] Motion for Leave to File Reply Letter Brief (St. John)
, Intervenors-Respondents. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY LETTER BRIEF 2 Counsel
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motion_reply_letter_brief_mst.pdf - 2022-03-09

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 11-04 - Petitioner motion for reconsideration

/supreme/docs/1104petitionermotion.pdf - 2011-12-05

[PDF] Motion for Leave to Participate in Oral Argument (Legal Scholars)
MINORITY LEADER, on behalf of the SENATE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS, Intervenors-Respondents. MOTION OF LEGAL
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motionlegalscholars.pdf - 2022-01-04

[PDF] Proposed Order re. Motion for Pro Hac Vice Status (Devaney)
-1- Supreme Court of Wisconsin NO. 2021AP001450-OA BILLIE JOHNSON, ERIC O’KEEFE, ED PERKINS, ...
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/proporderphvdevaney.pdf - 2021-12-15

[PDF] Emergency Motion for Stay and to File Additional Maps (Congressmen)

/courts/supreme/origact/docs/emergmotionstaycongressmen.pdf - 2022-03-07

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response of Wisconsin Elections Commission to Motion for Reconsideration
TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT’S DECEMBER 22, 2023 DECISION AND REMEDIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0104wecresponse.pdf - 2024-01-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2014. ¶3 Although the parties agreed to joint custody and equal shared placement of E. O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164379 - 2017-09-21

Christopher A. M. v. Trudie T.
litem’s recommendation that joint physical placement and custody was in Joseph’s best interest. In sum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4832 - 2005-03-31