Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6591 - 6600 of 87702 for n v.
Search results 6591 - 6600 of 87702 for n v.
State v. Larry D. Hicks
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Larry D. Hicks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Larry D. Hicks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06
State v. Alfonso Arias-Cruz
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Alfonso Arias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4452 - 2005-03-31
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Alfonso Arias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4452 - 2005-03-31
State v. David R. Kaster
, v. David R. Kaster, †Defendant-Appellant. Opinion Filed: March 28, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24626 - 2006-04-25
, v. David R. Kaster, †Defendant-Appellant. Opinion Filed: March 28, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24626 - 2006-04-25
John R. Chic v. Foots
, v. Officer Foots, Defendant-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9904 - 2005-03-31
, v. Officer Foots, Defendant-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9904 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy J. Hanson
DISTRICT IV State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16265 - 2005-03-31
DISTRICT IV State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16265 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barry L. Ball
of the term “victim” under Wis. Stat. § 973.20. In State v. Schmaling, 198 Wis. 2d 756, 761 n.3, 543 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2795 - 2005-03-31
of the term “victim” under Wis. Stat. § 973.20. In State v. Schmaling, 198 Wis. 2d 756, 761 n.3, 543 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2795 - 2005-03-31
State v. Raymond F. Schordie
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raymond F. Schordie, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11932 - 2005-03-31
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raymond F. Schordie, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11932 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bobby D. Swift
, v. Bobby D. Swift, Defendant-Appellant, Luis R. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31
, v. Bobby D. Swift, Defendant-Appellant, Luis R. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31
State v. Veldee T. Banks
of that motion. See Reiman Assocs., Inc. v. R/A Adver., Inc., 102 Wis. 2d 305, 306 n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6070 - 2005-03-31
of that motion. See Reiman Assocs., Inc. v. R/A Adver., Inc., 102 Wis. 2d 305, 306 n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6070 - 2005-03-31
Rudolph Konlock v. Anthony DePietro
and state officers and employees are entitled to immunity from suit. See Lodl v. Progressive N. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6787 - 2005-03-31
and state officers and employees are entitled to immunity from suit. See Lodl v. Progressive N. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6787 - 2005-03-31