Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 65971 - 65980 of 82637 for simple case.
Search results 65971 - 65980 of 82637 for simple case.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of refusing, or the right to alternative testing would not apply to Williams. This is not a case in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710100 - 2023-10-04
of refusing, or the right to alternative testing would not apply to Williams. This is not a case in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710100 - 2023-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for this case. The trial court then asked defense counsel, “[H]ow are we proceeding?” Counsel answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
for this case. The trial court then asked defense counsel, “[H]ow are we proceeding?” Counsel answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. The case proceeded to a jury trial. ¶3 Detective Mark Peterson was one of the State’s witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89601 - 2012-11-26
. The case proceeded to a jury trial. ¶3 Detective Mark Peterson was one of the State’s witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89601 - 2012-11-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and the court again found him competent. The case was then scheduled for a jury trial beginning on April 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053778 - 2025-12-23
, and the court again found him competent. The case was then scheduled for a jury trial beginning on April 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053778 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
State v. Andrew D. Wielunski
. While noting that there was no underlying factual dispute, the court stated the case presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14795 - 2005-03-31
. While noting that there was no underlying factual dispute, the court stated the case presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14795 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
heard a man yell from the car, “I told you I was gonna get you!” Two .40 caliber bullet casings were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912420 - 2025-02-11
heard a man yell from the car, “I told you I was gonna get you!” Two .40 caliber bullet casings were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912420 - 2025-02-11
State v. Anthony A. Kasparec
for materiality covers the "no request," "general request," and "specific request" cases of prosecutorial failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2005-03-31
for materiality covers the "no request," "general request," and "specific request" cases of prosecutorial failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2005-03-31
State v. Danny P.
to jail? A:Yeah, but she never said it was mine. In a termination case, a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11766 - 2005-03-31
to jail? A:Yeah, but she never said it was mine. In a termination case, a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11766 - 2005-03-31
James E. Jaderborg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
2000 WI App 246 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2528 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 246 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2528 - 2005-03-31