Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6601 - 6610 of 12860 for se.
Search results 6601 - 6610 of 12860 for se.
State v. Daniel Fredrick Cadotte
de novo. Id. ¶6 “Warrantless searches and seizures are ‘per se unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7209 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. ¶6 “Warrantless searches and seizures are ‘per se unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7209 - 2005-03-31
State v. Katherine E. Hepler
). The Supreme Court “‘has consistently held that warrantless searches are per se unreasonable under the fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5277 - 2005-03-31
). The Supreme Court “‘has consistently held that warrantless searches are per se unreasonable under the fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5277 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Garel
in the trial court, concedes that he did not specifically raise the double jeopardy issue in his pro se post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13391 - 2017-09-21
in the trial court, concedes that he did not specifically raise the double jeopardy issue in his pro se post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13391 - 2017-09-21
Adrian Scott Williams v. Racine County Circuit Court
. Williams, pro se. Respondent ATTORNEYSOn behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8244 - 2005-03-31
. Williams, pro se. Respondent ATTORNEYSOn behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gricel S. Echavarria
. The stipulation notes that, although not mitigating factors per se, this court may consider the fact
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16826 - 2017-09-21
. The stipulation notes that, although not mitigating factors per se, this court may consider the fact
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16826 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Carl A. Lewis, Jr., pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111421 - 2017-09-21
. Carl A. Lewis, Jr., pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111421 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Julius M. Covington, pro se, appeals from an order that denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Julius M. Covington, pro se, appeals from an order that denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
as essentially that anyone under the age of thirteen or with Asberger’s Disorder is per se incompetent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47843 - 2014-09-15
as essentially that anyone under the age of thirteen or with Asberger’s Disorder is per se incompetent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2018, Quinn, pro se, filed a motion for a continuance. Quinn’s motion stated that he was “served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256526 - 2020-03-17
, 2018, Quinn, pro se, filed a motion for a continuance. Quinn’s motion stated that he was “served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256526 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
concentration. ¶3 On July 23, 2008, Lay appeared, pro se, for a plea hearing and indicated he would plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51998 - 2014-09-15
concentration. ¶3 On July 23, 2008, Lay appeared, pro se, for a plea hearing and indicated he would plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51998 - 2014-09-15