Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6611 - 6620 of 20930 for word.

COURT OF APPEALS
photographs, each photograph showed a man with the words “Police Department Greendale, WI” below the man’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34977 - 2008-12-22

[PDF] Phyllis M. Landis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
language does not support her construction, and we may not look beyond the statute's unambiguous words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2231 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Buena Vista Shores Marina v. Michael B. Poston
the intent of the parties as discernible from their expressed words and purposes). ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25628 - 2017-09-21

Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
mentioned "fair market value." In other words, "the value" in the sentence following "but" could refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13993 - 2005-03-31

Otis Elevator Co. v. Fulcrum Construction Co.
consistently with what a reasonable person would understand the words to mean under the circumstances. Danbeck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25979 - 2006-08-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
then is that – I guess worded differently – is that you’re not attempting to collect costs or attorney’s fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78269 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jeffrey L. Woodson v. Marie E. Kreutzer
of way to such vehicle. The word "approaching," as here employed, involves a concept of nearness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9823 - 2017-09-19

James E. Vieau v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
to rules of construction or case law. Id., ¶13. Words and phrases in an insurance policy are ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7527 - 2005-03-31

World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Robert J. Mikulsky
World Wide argues that under the plain words of the statute, its damages “may include both the actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2752 - 2005-03-31

James Grafft v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
be necessary. See id. at 705-06. “Accordingly, whether the exact words used in an administrative rule appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2103 - 2005-03-31