Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6611 - 6620 of 20931 for word.
Search results 6611 - 6620 of 20931 for word.
[PDF]
Arthur H. Hurckman v. Secura Insurance Company
COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY 228 (1991). Foley's own words, in his affidavit, plainly state his intention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9898 - 2017-09-19
COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY 228 (1991). Foley's own words, in his affidavit, plainly state his intention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9898 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at the person is not innocent behavior. Words are not necessary to convey the likely meaning behind
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156432 - 2017-09-21
at the person is not innocent behavior. Words are not necessary to convey the likely meaning behind
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156432 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shawn R. Lee
ignore the plain wording of the statute; second, it would ignore precedent bearing on the obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
ignore the plain wording of the statute; second, it would ignore precedent bearing on the obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
Whistle B. Currier v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. Rankin, 2002 WI App 189, ¶8, 256 Wis. 2d 678, 649 N.W.2d 350. The common and ordinary usage of words may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20599 - 2006-01-24
. Rankin, 2002 WI App 189, ¶8, 256 Wis. 2d 678, 649 N.W.2d 350. The common and ordinary usage of words may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20599 - 2006-01-24
James Mews v. Wisconsin Department of Commerce
, ¶6, 258 Wis. 2d 351, 655 N.W.2d 175. ¶19 Generally, the word “shall” in a statute is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6033 - 2005-03-31
, ¶6, 258 Wis. 2d 351, 655 N.W.2d 175. ¶19 Generally, the word “shall” in a statute is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6033 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Junior Carr
the sentencing court for failing to use the magic words ‘minimum-custody standard,’” it appears that magic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18142 - 2017-09-21
the sentencing court for failing to use the magic words ‘minimum-custody standard,’” it appears that magic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18142 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
words, that Rothschild’s verbal notice that he could not obtain financing did not satisfy the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52591 - 2010-07-26
words, that Rothschild’s verbal notice that he could not obtain financing did not satisfy the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52591 - 2010-07-26
Taylor County Human Services Department v. Christine A.J.
the conditions established for the return of the child to the home. In other words, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10754 - 2005-03-31
the conditions established for the return of the child to the home. In other words, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10754 - 2005-03-31
Helen Pritchard v. Madison Metropolitan School District
. If the words of the statute convey the legislative intent, that ends our inquiry; we do not look beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2433 - 2005-03-31
. If the words of the statute convey the legislative intent, that ends our inquiry; we do not look beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2433 - 2005-03-31
Louis Zink, Jr. v. Akhatar Khwaja
consistently uses certain words in a single sense, we must assume that the legislature expressed its intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
consistently uses certain words in a single sense, we must assume that the legislature expressed its intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31