Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66501 - 66510 of 68814 for had.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of his blood, the police obtained a warrant for a blood draw. Lab testing showed that Abel had a blood
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344172 - 2021-03-10

COURT OF APPEALS
failure to report Reimer’s explanation that he had pulled into a subdivision was inadequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32746 - 2008-05-20

[PDF] WI 119
for attorney general, using resources of the State of Wisconsin over which Attorney Burke had authority
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34275 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
surveillance. Lukovsky, who by then had finished with his informant, arrived and identified Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48173 - 2010-04-05

August E. Fabyan v. Gregg Achtenhagen
....” As of June 26, 2002, no motion had been filed in the clerk’s office in Madison. [5] Wisconsin Stat. § 19.96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4675 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
recommended that the circuit court sentence McToy on one bail-jumping charge to the time he had already served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102980 - 2013-10-14

William N. Ledford v. Nancy Turcotte
of Corrections relating to an investigation into allegations that members of the prison correctional staff had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8181 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
by a person authorized to administer oaths that Newkirk had been placed under oath when signing the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14640 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the Oregon statute of limitations had expired. Fry asserts, “Arbitration supposedly speeds-up the resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89340 - 2012-11-13

Shirl L.B. v. Karl J.S.
the evidence would sustain if a specific finding supporting that result had been found.” Moonen v. Moonen, 39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14651 - 2005-03-31