Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 671 - 680 of 60432 for quit claim deed.
Search results 671 - 680 of 60432 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
WI APP 6
deed for the Property lists the grantees as “Gregory F. Felhofer and Mary L. Lynch, both single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104991 - 2017-09-21
deed for the Property lists the grantees as “Gregory F. Felhofer and Mary L. Lynch, both single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104991 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Instead, the issue the children have properly preserved is whether Mary’s claim can be heard as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28766 - 2007-04-23
Instead, the issue the children have properly preserved is whether Mary’s claim can be heard as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28766 - 2007-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
Mary’s claim can be heard as part of the probate proceeding. The children contend the court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28766 - 2014-09-15
Mary’s claim can be heard as part of the probate proceeding. The children contend the court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28766 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 95
the Ho-Chunk Nation’s claim for a refund of cigarette taxes under Wis. Stat. § 139.323 (2005-06)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32574 - 2011-06-14
the Ho-Chunk Nation’s claim for a refund of cigarette taxes under Wis. Stat. § 139.323 (2005-06)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32574 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI APP 95
. This appeal concerns the Ho-Chunk Nation’s claim for a refund of cigarette taxes under WIS. STAT. § 139.323
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32574 - 2014-09-15
. This appeal concerns the Ho-Chunk Nation’s claim for a refund of cigarette taxes under WIS. STAT. § 139.323
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32574 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing 3 Rivers’ claim for tortious interference with contract.1 We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84731 - 2014-09-15
dismissing 3 Rivers’ claim for tortious interference with contract.1 We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84731 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contemplated use of the land for public recreation and public park land, but there was also deed language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041525 - 2025-11-25
contemplated use of the land for public recreation and public park land, but there was also deed language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041525 - 2025-11-25
Timothy W. Hunter v. Mark D. Keys
and egress easement granted by deed across Hunter’s land to Keys’ property.[1] Hunter contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15065 - 2005-03-31
and egress easement granted by deed across Hunter’s land to Keys’ property.[1] Hunter contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15065 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Timothy W. Hunter v. Mark D. Keys
over a two-rod access and No. 99-0257-FT 2 egress easement granted by deed across
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15065 - 2017-09-21
over a two-rod access and No. 99-0257-FT 2 egress easement granted by deed across
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15065 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
) the parties acquiesced to a different boundary than described in their deeds, and (2) a corner marking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49938 - 2011-08-21
) the parties acquiesced to a different boundary than described in their deeds, and (2) a corner marking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49938 - 2011-08-21