Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6731 - 6740 of 64952 for or b.

State v. Thomas Faust
, Precision Technologies, Inc. (PTI). The State charged them with embezzlement, § 943.20(1)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11048 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard Moder
that the blood was properly withdrawn as required by WIS. STAT. § 343.305(5)(b);1 (2) the State failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2681 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Lacrosse v. Richard H. Masrud
). Section 346.37(1)(b), STATS., states, "When shown with or following the green, traffic facing a yellow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9049 - 2017-09-19

Michael H. Baarts v. Barbara Hammerberg
, Defendant-Appellant, PATRICIA MCCOY, Individually, and d/b/a CENTURY 21 OLYMPIA REALTY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9545 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Winnebago County Courthouse Electronic Notice Andrew Hinkel Electronic Notice Catherine B
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664863 - 2023-06-07

[PDF] County of Waupaca v. Samuel J. Hyland
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b). No. 00-0935-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2469 - 2017-09-19

Richard A. Engelbrecht v. Gary J. Simon
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] Section 799.207, Stats., provides in part: Proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13167 - 2005-03-31

Anthony M. Marick v.
, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b), and involves dishonesty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17144 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] County of Dane v. John W. Moore
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: PAUL B. HIGGINBOTHAM, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5159 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - Nunnemacher v. State
and had determined that legislatures could not interfere with this right by levying a tax. Justice John B
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases13.pdf - 2009-11-17