Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67621 - 67630 of 83434 for case codes/1000.
Search results 67621 - 67630 of 83434 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
the case that strangers to the situation likely would not have known, but Junior would have. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33845 - 2008-08-25
the case that strangers to the situation likely would not have known, but Junior would have. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33845 - 2008-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. C.D.W.’s paternity was established by DNA testing days before the TPR petition in this case was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955287 - 2025-05-13
. C.D.W.’s paternity was established by DNA testing days before the TPR petition in this case was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955287 - 2025-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
jurors. Four prospective jurors reported previous connections to sexual assault cases, but all stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36435 - 2005-03-31
jurors. Four prospective jurors reported previous connections to sexual assault cases, but all stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36435 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
home. Id. at 260-62, 264-66. Significant to the case before us, however, the court saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143920 - 2015-07-07
home. Id. at 260-62, 264-66. Significant to the case before us, however, the court saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143920 - 2015-07-07
State v. Jerry Harden
in the identification bureau. He identified, as a trial exhibit, the fingerprint card he completed in this case. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5604 - 2005-03-31
in the identification bureau. He identified, as a trial exhibit, the fingerprint card he completed in this case. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5604 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575006 - 2022-10-11
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575006 - 2022-10-11
CA Blank Order
to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114369 - 2006-09-19
to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114369 - 2006-09-19
State v. Anthony James Daniels
without a hearing.” Nelson, 54 Wis.2d at 497-98, 195 N.W.2d at 633. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10370 - 2005-03-31
without a hearing.” Nelson, 54 Wis.2d at 497-98, 195 N.W.2d at 633. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law and fact. The factual circumstances of the case and trial counsel’s conduct and strategy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244903 - 2019-08-08
of law and fact. The factual circumstances of the case and trial counsel’s conduct and strategy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244903 - 2019-08-08
Wisconsin Court System - What's happening in court?
are in court for any reason-whether they are witnesses, visitors to the courthouse, or involved in a case
/courts/resources/kid/activitybook/about.htm - 2026-03-10
are in court for any reason-whether they are witnesses, visitors to the courthouse, or involved in a case
/courts/resources/kid/activitybook/about.htm - 2026-03-10