Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6771 - 6780 of 16451 for commenting.

COURT OF APPEALS
of ADHD, and his completion of certain programs. Toliver focuses on an isolated comment in the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94978 - 2013-04-03

[PDF] State v. Kevon D. Davidson
improper supplemental instructions. Specifically, he objects to the following comments that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6595 - 2017-09-19

2006 WI APP 228
comments” discussing the impact of Coy. Id. at 376. The Thomas II court concluded that: While the sweep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26934 - 2006-11-20

COURT OF APPEALS
784, 789 (1979) (“The prosecutor may ‘comment on the evidence, detail the evidence, argue from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64979 - 2011-05-31

CA Blank Order
. by both children was “really limited.” The circuit court did comment that Johnny M. may have had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120984 - 2014-09-01

CA Blank Order
that decision easier. The comment had nothing to do with the sentence credit issue. [7] The third victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103136 - 2013-10-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the credibility of witnesses, and that the remarks and comments of attorneys are not evidence. Jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830891 - 2024-07-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
may ‘comment on the evidence, detail the evidence, argue from it to a conclusion and state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64979 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
comments that she was afraid something could happen to her. ¶11 Investigator Tweedie next observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597189 - 2022-12-06

State v. Kenneth L. Bingham
cocaine there on other occasions. Finally, the State commented on Bingham’s prior record, his family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20494 - 2005-12-05