Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6781 - 6790 of 49876 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 6781 - 6790 of 49876 for writ of certiorari forms.
Byron Des Jarlais v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
.[6] Coutts filed a petition for certiorari review in the Circuit Court for Dane County, Angela
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17049 - 2005-03-31
.[6] Coutts filed a petition for certiorari review in the Circuit Court for Dane County, Angela
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17049 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Warner Jackson v. John T. Benson
, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review. ¶9 In November 1999 the court of appeals allowed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17206 - 2017-09-21
, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review. ¶9 In November 1999 the court of appeals allowed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17206 - 2017-09-21
Warner Jackson v. John T. Benson
certiorari review. ¶9 In November 1999 the court of appeals allowed the State Elections Board to proceed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17206 - 2005-03-31
certiorari review. ¶9 In November 1999 the court of appeals allowed the State Elections Board to proceed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17206 - 2005-03-31
Ronald W. Coutts, Sr. v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
.[6] Coutts filed a petition for certiorari review in the Circuit Court for Dane County, Angela
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17034 - 2013-08-26
.[6] Coutts filed a petition for certiorari review in the Circuit Court for Dane County, Angela
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17034 - 2013-08-26
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
an internal appeal to the body’s Board of Control? Are the Halters entitled to certiorari relief
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929250 - 2025-03-14
an internal appeal to the body’s Board of Control? Are the Halters entitled to certiorari relief
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929250 - 2025-03-14
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2010
was limited to appealing from the board’s determination via an action for certiorari. The Nankin court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54993 - 2014-09-15
was limited to appealing from the board’s determination via an action for certiorari. The Nankin court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Racine v. Waste Facility Siting Board
4 Wis. Stat. § 70.47(13): “CERTIORARI. Except as provided in s. 70.85, appeal from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17099 - 2017-09-21
4 Wis. Stat. § 70.47(13): “CERTIORARI. Except as provided in s. 70.85, appeal from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17099 - 2017-09-21
Leonard Goetzka v. City of Black River Falls
findings. Generally, the decision of a board is challenged by means of a complaint for certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20000 - 2005-11-14
findings. Generally, the decision of a board is challenged by means of a complaint for certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20000 - 2005-11-14
[PDF]
Leonard Goetzka v. City of Black River Falls
is challenged by means of a complaint for certiorari review and the court reviews the board’s action based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20000 - 2017-09-21
is challenged by means of a complaint for certiorari review and the court reviews the board’s action based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20000 - 2017-09-21
City of Racine v. Waste Facility Siting Board
of Auchinleck narrowly applies to the statutes at issue in that case. [4] Wis. Stat. § 70.47(13): “Certiorari
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17099 - 2012-05-09
of Auchinleck narrowly applies to the statutes at issue in that case. [4] Wis. Stat. § 70.47(13): “Certiorari
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17099 - 2012-05-09