Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 74479 for public records.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 74479 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, counsel’s reports, and Hess’ response, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258752 - 2020-04-29
the record, counsel’s reports, and Hess’ response, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258752 - 2020-04-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
-in offenses and Linton’s prior criminal record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003800 - 2025-09-03
-in offenses and Linton’s prior criminal record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003800 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205700 - 2017-12-20
2 of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205700 - 2017-12-20
State v. James Arnold
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92740 - 2013-02-11
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92740 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as No. 2017AP1514-CRNM 2 mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206850 - 2018-01-09
of the record as No. 2017AP1514-CRNM 2 mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206850 - 2018-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
character including his substantial prior record, and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171603 - 2017-09-21
character including his substantial prior record, and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171603 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
by Conroy’s prior criminal record, the sentence does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138594 - 2015-03-31
by Conroy’s prior criminal record, the sentence does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138594 - 2015-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that they are public records, we rely on them here because Matson does not dispute them. See Charolais Breeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100036 - 2013-07-29
that they are public records, we rely on them here because Matson does not dispute them. See Charolais Breeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100036 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2007
as it relates to Wisconsin’s open meetings and public records law, and then to apply the framework to the facts
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30810 - 2014-09-15
as it relates to Wisconsin’s open meetings and public records law, and then to apply the framework to the facts
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30810 - 2014-09-15