Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 57351 for id.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 57351 for id.
State v. Robert J. Barnes
N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). First, the defendant must demonstrate the existence of a new factor. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). First, the defendant must demonstrate the existence of a new factor. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Dahl
tapes from the defendant, and turned them over to the FBI. Id. at 651-52. FBI agents then viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3637 - 2017-09-19
tapes from the defendant, and turned them over to the FBI. Id. at 651-52. FBI agents then viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3637 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Milligan
probability” that the “result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 320-21. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2346 - 2017-09-19
probability” that the “result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 320-21. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2346 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy A. Heisz
the prosecution has been substantially prejudiced. Id. at 283-84. The circuit court must apply this test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7259 - 2017-09-20
the prosecution has been substantially prejudiced. Id. at 283-84. The circuit court must apply this test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7259 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adopt the inference that supports the verdict. Id. Applying this deferential standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210829 - 2018-04-10
adopt the inference that supports the verdict. Id. Applying this deferential standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210829 - 2018-04-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
and his arguments are difficult to follow. No. 2008AP948-CR 4 Id. When the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35638 - 2014-09-15
and his arguments are difficult to follow. No. 2008AP948-CR 4 Id. When the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35638 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. No. 2011AP1960-CR 3 ¶5 We view the evidence in the light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15
is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. No. 2011AP1960-CR 3 ¶5 We view the evidence in the light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the guards should not be immune because their duty to prevent an escape was ministerial. Id. at 273. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
that the guards should not be immune because their duty to prevent an escape was ministerial. Id. at 273. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Whether a stop is reasonable is based upon the totality of the facts and circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36259 - 2014-09-15
. Whether a stop is reasonable is based upon the totality of the facts and circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36259 - 2014-09-15
State v. Nicholas V. Maiorano
.” Id. Stated another way, to satisfy the prejudice-prong, “‘[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26087 - 2006-08-07
.” Id. Stated another way, to satisfy the prejudice-prong, “‘[t]he defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26087 - 2006-08-07