Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 57370 for id.
Search results 6911 - 6920 of 57370 for id.
State v. D.L.S.
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31
State v. D.L.S.
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6126 - 2005-03-31
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (citation omitted). This is a “common sense” test, id. at 139
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86101 - 2014-09-15
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (citation omitted). This is a “common sense” test, id. at 139
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86101 - 2014-09-15
State v. Barry A. Schuh
constitutional guarantees is a question of law we review independently. See id. at 388-89. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2886 - 2005-03-31
constitutional guarantees is a question of law we review independently. See id. at 388-89. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2886 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285748 - 2020-09-09
exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285748 - 2020-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to determine whether that discretion was erroneously exercised.” Id., ¶22. An erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30088 - 2007-08-27
decision to determine whether that discretion was erroneously exercised.” Id., ¶22. An erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30088 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28635 - 2007-04-02
or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28635 - 2007-04-02
State v. Anthony J. Dentici
court’s informed and reasoned discretion. See id., 173 Wis. 2d at 136–137, 496 N.W.2d at 147. A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16070 - 2005-03-31
court’s informed and reasoned discretion. See id., 173 Wis. 2d at 136–137, 496 N.W.2d at 147. A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16070 - 2005-03-31
Jason Cantwell v. Jenny Hayward
is the “ultimate arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses.” Id. at 250, 274 N.W.2d at 650. Any reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13258 - 2005-03-31
is the “ultimate arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses.” Id. at 250, 274 N.W.2d at 650. Any reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13258 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of facts unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶10. The right to a speedy trial is not subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
of facts unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶10. The right to a speedy trial is not subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06