Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 69391 - 69400 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
Search results 69391 - 69400 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is 1 Rader also raises arguments on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684911 - 2023-08-02
that this case is 1 Rader also raises arguments on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684911 - 2023-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
a prima facie case. State v. Jipson, 2003 WI App 222, ¶7, 267 Wis. 2d 467, 671 N.W.2d 18. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09
a prima facie case. State v. Jipson, 2003 WI App 222, ¶7, 267 Wis. 2d 467, 671 N.W.2d 18. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553995 - 2022-08-10
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553995 - 2022-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, the supreme court noted that “in this case, there is no question that Lamar is entitled to just compensation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115254 - 2014-06-24
, the supreme court noted that “in this case, there is no question that Lamar is entitled to just compensation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115254 - 2014-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
there was no “reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop the individuals in this case,” there was no constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134240 - 2015-02-02
there was no “reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop the individuals in this case,” there was no constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134240 - 2015-02-02
CA Blank Order
sentence. In addition, Motley agreed to pay full restitution in all three cases.[2] The trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133040 - 2015-01-14
sentence. In addition, Motley agreed to pay full restitution in all three cases.[2] The trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133040 - 2015-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case; and (2) when the jury had before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191890 - 2017-09-21
important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case; and (2) when the jury had before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191890 - 2017-09-21
Ed Fett v. Thomas A. Luksetich
to submit their respective cases by documents, briefs or other statements of position in lieu of a Hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10586 - 2005-03-31
to submit their respective cases by documents, briefs or other statements of position in lieu of a Hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
State v. Cornell D. Reynolds
2005 WI App 222 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2389-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19677 - 2005-10-27
2005 WI App 222 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2389-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19677 - 2005-10-27