Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 57365 for id.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 57365 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285748 - 2020-09-09
exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285748 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
should not be immune because their duty to prevent an escape was ministerial. Id. at 273. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35979 - 2014-09-15
should not be immune because their duty to prevent an escape was ministerial. Id. at 273. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35979 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to determine whether that discretion was erroneously exercised.” Id., ¶22. An erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30088 - 2007-08-27
decision to determine whether that discretion was erroneously exercised.” Id., ¶22. An erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30088 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28635 - 2007-04-02
or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28635 - 2007-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
State v. Anthony J. Dentici
court’s informed and reasoned discretion. See id., 173 Wis. 2d at 136–137, 496 N.W.2d at 147. A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16070 - 2005-03-31
court’s informed and reasoned discretion. See id., 173 Wis. 2d at 136–137, 496 N.W.2d at 147. A trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chad T. Maxon
was in fact valid when he approached the vehicle’s driver. Id. at 560. However, that is not the situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3176 - 2017-09-19
was in fact valid when he approached the vehicle’s driver. Id. at 560. However, that is not the situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3176 - 2017-09-19
Jason Cantwell v. Jenny Hayward
is the “ultimate arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses.” Id. at 250, 274 N.W.2d at 650. Any reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13258 - 2005-03-31
is the “ultimate arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses.” Id. at 250, 274 N.W.2d at 650. Any reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13258 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of facts unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶10. The right to a speedy trial is not subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
of facts unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶10. The right to a speedy trial is not subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties. Id., ¶40 (citation omitted). Whether a new factor exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150724 - 2017-09-21
, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties. Id., ¶40 (citation omitted). Whether a new factor exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150724 - 2017-09-21