Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 57365 for id.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 57365 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Milligan
probability” that the “result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 320-21. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2346 - 2017-09-19
probability” that the “result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 320-21. Consequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2346 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has been demonstrated, we follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35638 - 2009-02-23
, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has been demonstrated, we follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35638 - 2009-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. ¶5 We view the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118202 - 2014-07-28
of the evidence is for the jury to decide. Id. at 504. ¶5 We view the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118202 - 2014-07-28
State v. D.L.S.
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31
State v. D.L.S.
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6126 - 2005-03-31
assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate assistance and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a condition of return due to her incarceration. Id., ¶¶10-11, 55. The supreme court held “a parent’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28141 - 2014-09-15
a condition of return due to her incarceration. Id., ¶¶10-11, 55. The supreme court held “a parent’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (citation omitted). This is a “common sense” test, id. at 139
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86101 - 2014-09-15
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id. (citation omitted). This is a “common sense” test, id. at 139
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86101 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the guards should not be immune because their duty to prevent an escape was ministerial. Id. at 273. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
that the guards should not be immune because their duty to prevent an escape was ministerial. Id. at 273. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
State v. Barry A. Schuh
constitutional guarantees is a question of law we review independently. See id. at 388-89. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2886 - 2005-03-31
constitutional guarantees is a question of law we review independently. See id. at 388-89. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2886 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285748 - 2020-09-09
exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285748 - 2020-09-09