Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 57351 for id.
Search results 6961 - 6970 of 57351 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether a stop is reasonable is based upon the totality of the facts and circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36259 - 2009-04-22
. Whether a stop is reasonable is based upon the totality of the facts and circumstances. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36259 - 2009-04-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
irrelevant or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28635 - 2014-09-15
irrelevant or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28635 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28635 - 2007-04-02
or improper factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28635 - 2007-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
discretion when it provides a “rational and explainable basis” for the sentence. Id., ¶39. In order to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28217 - 2007-02-26
discretion when it provides a “rational and explainable basis” for the sentence. Id., ¶39. In order to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28217 - 2007-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id., ¶10. We uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82866 - 2014-09-15
. Id., ¶10. We uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82866 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86101 - 2012-08-14
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86101 - 2012-08-14
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Seitz
, the convictions are supported by sufficient evidence. See id. at 400, 509 N.W.2d at 344. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9290 - 2017-09-19
, the convictions are supported by sufficient evidence. See id. at 400, 509 N.W.2d at 344. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9290 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
did not bring about the need for a retrial by exercising a protected right.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
did not bring about the need for a retrial by exercising a protected right.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian M. Christopher
of the officer to believe that criminal activity is afoot.” Id. ¶3 This case is similar to Rutzinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4394 - 2017-09-19
of the officer to believe that criminal activity is afoot.” Id. ¶3 This case is similar to Rutzinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4394 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of facts unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶10. The right to a speedy trial is not subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
of facts unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶10. The right to a speedy trial is not subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06