Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6991 - 7000 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

Jami L. Van Boxtel v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
JUDGE: John A. Des Jardins JUSTICES: Concurred
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17480 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert G. Harkey
to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. On the performance prong, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11408 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
or adequately preserved for appeal is a question of law this court reviews de novo."). Additionally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489857 - 2022-04-05

[PDF] Patricia S. Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan
judgment to PICW. Such decisions are reviewed de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226 Wis. 2d 798, 805, 595 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17455 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Terry Spaulding v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.
presents a question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶12. Similarly, our review of a trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6928 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 93
bearing.” The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied where it is clear from the lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64408 - 2014-09-15

State v. Harris D. Byers
added.) ¶16 Statutory construction presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2273 - 2005-03-31

WI App 93 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1723 Complete Title ...
level of review, the de novo standard, is applied where it is clear from the lack of agency precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64408 - 2011-06-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶4 “We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80188 - 2014-09-15

Harrold J. McComas v. Loren Tallmadge
. The construction of a testamentary document presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Furmanski v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13099 - 2005-03-31