Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7021 - 7030 of 30142 for consulta de causas.

Clearpointe Capital, Inc. v. Rickey Townsend
We review both the denial of a motion to dismiss and the grant of a summary judgment motion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6552 - 2005-03-31

State v. Esteban R.M.
and whether such actions prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11895 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert Simmons
that we review de novo. Id. ¶6 Moreover, the temporary detention of a citizen constitutes a seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7353 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and application of § 980.09 are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010 WI 46, ¶13, 325
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156112 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether the circuit court applied a proper legal standard: “[W]hether the facts found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109120 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29083 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Edward A. Hinrichs v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
, and the Hinrichs appeal. II. Analysis ¶5 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2720 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Pinter v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32461 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jason J. Trawitzki
prohibition against double jeopardy. This is a question of law, which we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15917 - 2005-03-31

Verifone Finance, Inc. v. City of Glendale
grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15944 - 2005-03-31