Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7031 - 7040 of 58944 for dos.
Search results 7031 - 7040 of 58944 for dos.
COURT OF APPEALS
him to do so. ¶9 We acknowledge that entering a restitution order may not have been the best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56533 - 2010-11-09
him to do so. ¶9 We acknowledge that entering a restitution order may not have been the best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56533 - 2010-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
do not satisfy the requirements for ‘newly-discovered’ evidence because the evidence did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617314 - 2023-02-02
do not satisfy the requirements for ‘newly-discovered’ evidence because the evidence did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617314 - 2023-02-02
Mary L. Schommer v. Michael W. Schommer
failure to do so.” The court found that Schommer “continues to be in violation of the child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4628 - 2005-03-31
failure to do so.” The court found that Schommer “continues to be in violation of the child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4628 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying the motion because it would be premature to do so depending on the trial testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35807 - 2014-09-15
denying the motion because it would be premature to do so depending on the trial testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35807 - 2014-09-15
State v. Brian Misovy
is the penalty that I have described to you.[1] Do you understand what I am saying? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12777 - 2005-03-31
is the penalty that I have described to you.[1] Do you understand what I am saying? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12777 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
with appellate counsel that these issues do not have arguable merit for appeal. With regard to the entry of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109858 - 2014-04-08
with appellate counsel that these issues do not have arguable merit for appeal. With regard to the entry of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109858 - 2014-04-08
[PDF]
State v. Arthur E. Messick
that by doing so here, the trial court exceeded its sentencing authority and erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2578 - 2017-09-19
that by doing so here, the trial court exceeded its sentencing authority and erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2578 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Shannon C. Krause
authority (or lack of it) to do so, and no reference to any fact- based reasons why the court should not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15861 - 2017-09-21
authority (or lack of it) to do so, and no reference to any fact- based reasons why the court should not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15861 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy R. Ragner
authority (or lack of it) to do so, and no reference to any fact- based reasons why the court should not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15860 - 2017-09-21
authority (or lack of it) to do so, and no reference to any fact- based reasons why the court should not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15860 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of River Falls v. Jamie T. Kjos
was doing. Sather admitted that he parked his car behind Kjos’ vehicle as a part of his investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14929 - 2017-09-21
was doing. Sather admitted that he parked his car behind Kjos’ vehicle as a part of his investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14929 - 2017-09-21