Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7041 - 7050 of 64960 for or b.
Search results 7041 - 7050 of 64960 for or b.
95-05 SCR Chapter 60
. (b) Make recommendations to the supreme court for amendment to the code of judicial conduct
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1034 - 2005-03-31
. (b) Make recommendations to the supreme court for amendment to the code of judicial conduct
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1034 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
decision regarding representation, contrary to SCR 20:1.4(b)[6] (Count Three); engaged in conduct involving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146523 - 2015-08-17
decision regarding representation, contrary to SCR 20:1.4(b)[6] (Count Three); engaged in conduct involving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146523 - 2015-08-17
[PDF]
WI APP 60
presumption of paternity relative to WIS. STAT. § 891.41(1)(b). ¶7 The issue in this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32131 - 2014-09-15
presumption of paternity relative to WIS. STAT. § 891.41(1)(b). ¶7 The issue in this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32131 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. §§ 948.02(1); 939.50(3)(b); and 973.01(1) (1997-98). He was convicted of committing repeated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104668 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. §§ 948.02(1); 939.50(3)(b); and 973.01(1) (1997-98). He was convicted of committing repeated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
years’ extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(1)(b) (2003-04) 3 (classifying first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26400 - 2017-09-21
years’ extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(1)(b) (2003-04) 3 (classifying first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Jordan
admissible, see WIS. STAT. § 908.01(4)(b)1 & 4; (2) even if not admissible, Cardosa’s statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6508 - 2017-09-19
admissible, see WIS. STAT. § 908.01(4)(b)1 & 4; (2) even if not admissible, Cardosa’s statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6508 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 908.01(4)(b)5. A coconspirator’s statement “is in furtherance of the conspiracy if it reassures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131995 - 2017-09-21
. § 908.01(4)(b)5. A coconspirator’s statement “is in furtherance of the conspiracy if it reassures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131995 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wayne A. Sutton
), and a Class H felony, a fifth PAC offense under Wis. Stat. §§ 346.63(1)(b) and 346.65(2)(e). [2] Both
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21484 - 2006-02-21
), and a Class H felony, a fifth PAC offense under Wis. Stat. §§ 346.63(1)(b) and 346.65(2)(e). [2] Both
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21484 - 2006-02-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. Wincek
, contrary to § 943.20(1)(b), STATS., and ordered him to pay $4,501.37 in restitution to a homeowner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11804 - 2017-09-21
, contrary to § 943.20(1)(b), STATS., and ordered him to pay $4,501.37 in restitution to a homeowner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11804 - 2017-09-21
95-05 SCR Chapter 60
. (b) Make recommendations to the supreme court for amendment to the code of judicial conduct
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1206 - 2005-03-31
. (b) Make recommendations to the supreme court for amendment to the code of judicial conduct
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1206 - 2005-03-31