Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7061 - 7070 of 83765 for simple case search.
Search results 7061 - 7070 of 83765 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Roscoe Patterson
admitted that they were his and signed a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12650 - 2017-09-21
admitted that they were his and signed a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12650 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roscoe Patterson
a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson was not in custody when he signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12650 - 2005-03-31
a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson was not in custody when he signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12650 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bobby Recco Jones
was ineffective by not moving to suppress evidence recovered in a search. To establish ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11592 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective by not moving to suppress evidence recovered in a search. To establish ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bobby Recco Jones
in a search. To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11592 - 2017-09-19
in a search. To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11592 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Bunten
Christopher Bunten’s motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5527 - 2017-09-19
Christopher Bunten’s motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5527 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Aurora Medical Group v. Department of Workforce Development
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1546 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14087 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1546 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14087 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. To the average person, if I would stop anybody else, it would be a simple quick yes or no. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91612 - 2013-01-14
. To the average person, if I would stop anybody else, it would be a simple quick yes or no. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91612 - 2013-01-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
it. The case was later dismissed, without prejudice, at the State’s request. ¶3 The State re-filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44953 - 2014-09-15
it. The case was later dismissed, without prejudice, at the State’s request. ¶3 The State re-filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44953 - 2014-09-15
Aurora Medical Group v. Department of Workforce Development
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14087 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14087 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and denied it. The case was later dismissed, without prejudice, at the State’s request. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44953 - 2009-12-22
and denied it. The case was later dismissed, without prejudice, at the State’s request. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44953 - 2009-12-22