Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 70751 - 70760 of 84745 for case number.
Search results 70751 - 70760 of 84745 for case number.
Peter J. Ambler v. Richard F. Rice
, the case moves to a second phase called a "suit within a suit" to determine what the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9563 - 2005-03-31
, the case moves to a second phase called a "suit within a suit" to determine what the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9563 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123951 - 2014-10-09
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123951 - 2014-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
case, the State relied on Marlock’s testimony to prove a justifiable basis for the warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05
case, the State relied on Marlock’s testimony to prove a justifiable basis for the warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830250 - 2024-07-25
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830250 - 2024-07-25
Marion Kay Smith v. Robert Joseph Smith
in each individual case determine to be relevant.” Sec. 767.255(3)(m). The division of the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5614 - 2005-03-31
in each individual case determine to be relevant.” Sec. 767.255(3)(m). The division of the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5614 - 2005-03-31
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
of the case. Per curiam opinions may not be cited for any purpose, except to support a claim of claim
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100853 - 2013-08-11
of the case. Per curiam opinions may not be cited for any purpose, except to support a claim of claim
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100853 - 2013-08-11
Jeffrey K. Krohn v. Margaret Browder
to this court. Habeas Corpus. We agree with the circuit court that this case is one which should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11511 - 2005-03-31
to this court. Habeas Corpus. We agree with the circuit court that this case is one which should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
purchased by Cavalry. ¶3 Cavalry filed the summons and complaint in this case on February 28, 2024
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024513 - 2025-10-16
purchased by Cavalry. ¶3 Cavalry filed the summons and complaint in this case on February 28, 2024
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024513 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decided to resolve the case with a plea agreement. Pursuant to its terms, he pled guilty to first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099523 - 2026-04-02
decided to resolve the case with a plea agreement. Pursuant to its terms, he pled guilty to first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099523 - 2026-04-02
Willie Hampton v. Jose T. Lloren, M.D.
that he is a private physician and not a state employee. In the case of an alleged violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11409 - 2005-03-31
that he is a private physician and not a state employee. In the case of an alleged violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11409 - 2005-03-31