Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7091 - 7100 of 13577 for competency.

COURT OF APPEALS
), in any court of competent jurisdiction. An employee may bring an action against an employer under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35997 - 2009-03-25

COURT OF APPEALS
reject them because competing factors tip the balance in favor of affirming the restitution award. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83041 - 2012-05-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is competent to proceed pro se.” State v. Thornton, 2002 WI App 294, ¶14, 259 Wis. 2d 157, 656 N.W.2d 45
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170640 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Perry R. Neal
of professionally competent representation. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. Because “[j]udicial scrutiny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7504 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. David E. Bowers
of professionally competent assistance.” See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. To show prejudice, the defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4310 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
not competent to enter her plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily at the time it was entered. A circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21

State v. Cornell D. Reynolds
outside the range of professionally competent representation, measured by the objective standard of what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19677 - 2005-10-27

John P. Zakowski for the State Department of Workforce Development ex rel Wayne M. Vanden v.
competing factual assertions as to when the agreement was made, be it during the conversation in which CWA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7284 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Professional Guardianships, Inc. v. Ruth E. J.
treatment extends to incompetent as well as competent individuals. Id. at 74, 482 N.W.2d at 67
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9411 - 2017-09-19

State v. David E. Bowers
of professionally competent assistance.” See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. To show prejudice, the defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4310 - 2005-03-31