Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 711 - 720 of 1433 for owen.

COURT OF APPEALS
as to shock the public conscience.” State v. Owen, 202 Wis. 2d 620, 645, 551 N.W.2d 50 (Ct. App. 1996); see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120440 - 2014-08-27

COURT OF APPEALS
. Owens, 148 Wis. 2d 922, 929-30, 436 N.W.2d 869 (1989). ¶20 Martinez offered no alternative basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34571 - 2008-11-17

CA Blank Order
. Owens, 148 Wis. 2d 922, 929-30, 436 N.W.2d 869 (1989). We have carefully reviewed the transcript
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121750 - 2014-09-11

COURT OF APPEALS
. Owens, 148 Wis. 2d 922, 930, 436 N.W.2d 869 (1989). The circuit court’s findings were not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34556 - 2008-11-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
precedent holding that oral permission is revocable and does not create an easement. In French v. Owen, 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79822 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Edward C. Brandau
unless they are clearly erroneous. State v. Owens, 148 Wis.2d 922, 929-30, 436 N.W.2d 869, 872 (1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14796 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
person based on the expert testimony and other evidence presented by the State. See State v. Owens
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
in the testimony likewise were exclusively for the trial court, not this court. See State v. Owens, 148 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84916 - 2012-07-17

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
—are discretionary; we review only whether the court erroneously exercised its discretion. See State v. Owens
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061667 - 2026-01-14

[PDF] NOTICE
. Daniels, 117 Wis. 2d 9, 22, 343 N.W.2d 411 (Ct. App. 1983); see State v. Owen, 202 Wis. 2d 620, 645
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35637 - 2014-09-15