Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7161 - 7170 of 68274 for did.
Search results 7161 - 7170 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
defense. The escape instruction was not erroneous and did not unconstitutionally mislead the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122819 - 2014-10-01
defense. The escape instruction was not erroneous and did not unconstitutionally mislead the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122819 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
action at that point. The court did not address the No. 2007AP1411-CR 2 State’s additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15
action at that point. The court did not address the No. 2007AP1411-CR 2 State’s additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15
State v. Darrin D. Grosskopf
the defense did not exist in order to sustain a finding of first-degree intentional homicide. Section 940.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
the defense did not exist in order to sustain a finding of first-degree intentional homicide. Section 940.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
State v. Amanda L. Gear
it did, and therefore we affirm. ¶2 Through various schemes Gear stole substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6275 - 2005-03-31
it did, and therefore we affirm. ¶2 Through various schemes Gear stole substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6275 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, counsel elected not to present the sister’s testimony because counsel did not know the likely content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137275 - 2015-03-17
, counsel elected not to present the sister’s testimony because counsel did not know the likely content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137275 - 2015-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
VanDinter moved to suppress all evidence from the stop, arguing Running did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36656 - 2009-06-01
VanDinter moved to suppress all evidence from the stop, arguing Running did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36656 - 2009-06-01
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court adequately explained the elements of his crime, and he therefore did not enter a knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47143 - 2010-02-17
the circuit court adequately explained the elements of his crime, and he therefore did not enter a knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47143 - 2010-02-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
the administrative law judge’s decisions; (4) substantial evidence did not support a particular factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63156 - 2014-09-15
the administrative law judge’s decisions; (4) substantial evidence did not support a particular factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63156 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert Steigerwaldt v. Township of King
that the stipulation was unenforceable because he did not agree to it and his attorney was No(s). 98-1153 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13921 - 2014-09-15
that the stipulation was unenforceable because he did not agree to it and his attorney was No(s). 98-1153 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it did not have the requested records in its possession. It also attached the May 10, 2021 letter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709303 - 2023-10-05
that it did not have the requested records in its possession. It also attached the May 10, 2021 letter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709303 - 2023-10-05