Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 721 - 730 of 55954 for so.

[PDF] NOTICE
and then they refer on to us about half of those and then our – my work unit supervisor assigns cases at random. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31247 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed and read in at sentencing. During the plea colloquy, the circuit court asked: “So has anybody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686135 - 2023-08-03

[PDF] NOTICE
trial because prejudicial testimony obtained through prosecutorial misconduct so tainted his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53150 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
out a sentence so disparate from those given her co- actors as to shock the public conscience. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32710 - 2014-09-15

State v. Andres Godina
the dead time credit. Eighteen months would leave—with a dead time credit, I’m not so certain it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andres Godina
the dead time credit. Eighteen months would leave—with a dead time credit, I’m not so certain it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
found concerning except for one person I struck, so the rest I essentially did on their known criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02

[PDF] State v. Michael O. Thomas
, and, if so, (2) that “the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687; see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6005 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael O. Thomas
prove two things: (1) that his or her lawyer’s performance was deficient, and, if so, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reliance is “whether the court gave ‘explicit attention’ or ‘specific consideration’ to it, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107984 - 2017-09-21