Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7201 - 7210 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 7201 - 7210 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
State v. Harold W. Zastrow
vehicles within one city block of Lohr’s address, which was listed on the bond form. Zastrow posted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2727 - 2005-03-31
vehicles within one city block of Lohr’s address, which was listed on the bond form. Zastrow posted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the trial court to inquire about the amount of sentence credit granted, noting that Taylor’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156077 - 2017-09-21
the trial court to inquire about the amount of sentence credit granted, noting that Taylor’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156077 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discovered evidence proved that Probation Agent Stephanie Lutz falsely stated he had completed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-30
discovered evidence proved that Probation Agent Stephanie Lutz falsely stated he had completed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence proved that Probation Agent Stephanie Lutz falsely stated he had completed a residential sex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-29
evidence proved that Probation Agent Stephanie Lutz falsely stated he had completed a residential sex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-29
[PDF]
State v. David J. Clark
. On March 15, 1991, the trial court withheld sentence and placed Clark on twenty years of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4443 - 2017-09-19
. On March 15, 1991, the trial court withheld sentence and placed Clark on twenty years of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4443 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of probation (Rule 21) imposed on Robert B. Ciarpaglini in April 2004 by the Wisconsin Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32619 - 2008-05-06
of probation (Rule 21) imposed on Robert B. Ciarpaglini in April 2004 by the Wisconsin Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32619 - 2008-05-06
[PDF]
State v. David R. Bjerkaas
following revocation of his probation. He contends No(s). 99-2644-CR 2 that his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16092 - 2017-09-21
following revocation of his probation. He contends No(s). 99-2644-CR 2 that his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dante R. Voss
two. However, the court stayed those sentences and placed Voss on four-years’ probation for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18388 - 2017-09-21
two. However, the court stayed those sentences and placed Voss on four-years’ probation for each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18388 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dante R. Voss
on four-years’ probation for each count in each case, concurrent to the other counts in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18388 - 2005-06-01
on four-years’ probation for each count in each case, concurrent to the other counts in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18388 - 2005-06-01
State v. Dante R. Voss
on four-years’ probation for each count in each case, concurrent to the other counts in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18387 - 2005-06-01
on four-years’ probation for each count in each case, concurrent to the other counts in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18387 - 2005-06-01