Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7211 - 7220 of 83277 for case search.
Search results 7211 - 7220 of 83277 for case search.
State v. Mark E. Nelson
to as “legitimate expectation of privacy,” that has been developed by case law to define when a search or seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25275 - 2006-06-27
to as “legitimate expectation of privacy,” that has been developed by case law to define when a search or seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25275 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Mark E. Nelson
to as “legitimate expectation of privacy,” that has been developed by case law to define when a search or seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25275 - 2017-09-21
to as “legitimate expectation of privacy,” that has been developed by case law to define when a search or seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246228 - 2019-09-03
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246228 - 2019-09-03
[PDF]
City of Stevens Point v. Michael C. Wirtz
to fifty operating while intoxicated cases. ¶4 Officer Uitenbroek testified that on August 25, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3844 - 2017-09-20
to fifty operating while intoxicated cases. ¶4 Officer Uitenbroek testified that on August 25, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3844 - 2017-09-20
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
breath sample by the violated PBT process was an unconstitutional search and seizure. The taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
breath sample by the violated PBT process was an unconstitutional search and seizure. The taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jill A. Moore
is correct, the conviction still must be vacated. While we must normally search the record for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7218 - 2017-09-20
is correct, the conviction still must be vacated. While we must normally search the record for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7218 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the police department and strip searched. Officers observed contraband in Corder’s groin area, but due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840107 - 2024-08-20
to the police department and strip searched. Officers observed contraband in Corder’s groin area, but due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840107 - 2024-08-20
CA Blank Order
a jury trial and numerous other potential issues arise in cases tried to a jury, i.e., jury selection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107905 - 2014-02-11
a jury trial and numerous other potential issues arise in cases tried to a jury, i.e., jury selection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107905 - 2014-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
against unreasonable searches and seizures. 5 “‘The temporary detention of individuals during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124263 - 2017-09-21
against unreasonable searches and seizures. 5 “‘The temporary detention of individuals during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124263 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
was an unconstitutional search and seizure. The taking of a breath sample is a search and seizure under the provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9876 - 2017-09-19
was an unconstitutional search and seizure. The taking of a breath sample is a search and seizure under the provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9876 - 2017-09-19