Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7261 - 7270 of 15546 for fee.
Search results 7261 - 7270 of 15546 for fee.
State v. James R. Brownson
that “MicroRentals allows purchase of the above system and will apply 70% of rental fees as discount” and Brownson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
that “MicroRentals allows purchase of the above system and will apply 70% of rental fees as discount” and Brownson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Burton Davis v. Elizabeth Schultz-Davis
fee. The contempt order could be purged, however, if Burton answered the interrogatories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9985 - 2017-09-19
fee. The contempt order could be purged, however, if Burton answered the interrogatories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9985 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the appropriate amount of attorney’s fees and costs. ¶2 Sabol challenges the 2004 tax assessment for a portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34970 - 2014-09-15
of the appropriate amount of attorney’s fees and costs. ¶2 Sabol challenges the 2004 tax assessment for a portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34970 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James R. Brownson
of the above system and will apply 70% of rental fees as discount” and Brownson’s insertion “will get initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11911 - 2017-09-21
of the above system and will apply 70% of rental fees as discount” and Brownson’s insertion “will get initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11911 - 2017-09-21
Jimmie A. Woodford v. Dorothy Bolter
damages of $450. The trial court awarded attorneys fees of $6,660 to Woodford, also pursuant to § 100.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5442 - 2005-03-31
damages of $450. The trial court awarded attorneys fees of $6,660 to Woodford, also pursuant to § 100.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5442 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
regarding the $1,350 in costs and attorney’s fees were clearly erroneous. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27497 - 2010-12-18
regarding the $1,350 in costs and attorney’s fees were clearly erroneous. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27497 - 2010-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for payment of rent, along with corresponding late fees. The parties subsequently entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449492 - 2021-11-09
for payment of rent, along with corresponding late fees. The parties subsequently entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449492 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it is entitled to attorney fees and costs under its contract with the Joint Venture. It also seeks an award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98394 - 2014-09-15
it is entitled to attorney fees and costs under its contract with the Joint Venture. It also seeks an award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98394 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
should be granted. ¶3 PDM next argues it is entitled to attorney fees and costs under its contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98394 - 2013-06-24
should be granted. ¶3 PDM next argues it is entitled to attorney fees and costs under its contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98394 - 2013-06-24
Frontsheet
discretion. The circuit court awarded Heritage Farms its attorney fees and costs. However, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79674 - 2012-06-07
discretion. The circuit court awarded Heritage Farms its attorney fees and costs. However, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79674 - 2012-06-07