Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 72751 - 72760 of 77584 for judgment for u s.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner’s dismissal stands as the court’s judgment. See § 799.207(2)(b). ¶3 In his briefing, Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197398 - 2017-10-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). No. 2013AP2837-CRNM 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110317 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
rejected this claim. “[S]ufficiency of the evidence review [is] ‘independent of the jury’s determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458073 - 2021-11-30

[PDF] 2023 State of the Judiciary Address
Judge Timothy S. Gebert, Wood County Judge Cody J. Horlacher, Waukesha County Judge Mark
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress23.pdf - 2023-11-01

[PDF] Supreme Court rule 13-14 - Follow-up Report submitted by Hon. Paul Lundsten
for the judicial decision(s). 4. If you have changed your practice by employing the techniques or employing
/supreme/docs/1314followupreportlundsten.pdf - 2017-02-01

[PDF] Microsoft Word - eFiling rule petition SUPPORTING MEMO Petition #14-03
Rules ch. 16; Kansas Supreme Court Admin. Order 268; Minnesota Admin. Order 10-8011 and S. Ct. Rule 11
/supreme/docs/1403petitionsupport.pdf - 2014-11-03

[PDF] Greene County adult treatment court: TC1 - Participant handbook (Sample handbook)
Page 12 of 13 Missouri law provides that the sentencing judge may consider the reason(s) you were
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/fourtrackhandbook.pdf - 2021-09-23

[PDF] 2020 Wisconsin Pretrial Survey
in the EBDM Pretrial Pilot Program initiative stated that, “[s]ince beginning pretrial, we have heard nothing
/courts/programs/docs/2020pretrialsurveyreport.pdf - 2021-05-21

[PDF] Rules Petition 08-17
53707-7158 __________________________________________ Atty. Diane S. Diel President-Elect State
/supreme/docs/0817petition.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] Expert Report of Dr. John Alford (Attachment to Wisconsin Legislature Reply Brief)
10’s potential performance. His critique focuses exclusively on the results of a single election
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/expertrepalford3.pdf - 2022-01-04