Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7311 - 7320 of 68466 for did.
Search results 7311 - 7320 of 68466 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
is not entitled to withdraw his plea. We also conclude that the trial court did not err in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27471 - 2014-09-15
is not entitled to withdraw his plea. We also conclude that the trial court did not err in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27471 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing maximum, consecutive sentences; and (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959795 - 2025-05-28
it did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing maximum, consecutive sentences; and (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959795 - 2025-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
” for withdrawal. Ericka did not, however, frame her argument this way in the circuit court and, therefore, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117318 - 2014-07-16
” for withdrawal. Ericka did not, however, frame her argument this way in the circuit court and, therefore, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117318 - 2014-07-16
[PDF]
WI APP 231
than a person who was driving while intoxicated but did not cause a death or great bodily harm.3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26678 - 2014-09-15
than a person who was driving while intoxicated but did not cause a death or great bodily harm.3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26678 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Scott R. Bunker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
conclude that it did. We do not address other procedural or evidentiary objections because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4728 - 2017-09-19
conclude that it did. We do not address other procedural or evidentiary objections because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4728 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this is a close case, we conclude that the prosecutor’s comments did not constitute a material and substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613536 - 2023-01-24
this is a close case, we conclude that the prosecutor’s comments did not constitute a material and substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613536 - 2023-01-24
[PDF]
WI APP 91
to Plaintiff’s voluntary promotion to [a] management position which did not offer that benefit[.]” Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98257 - 2017-09-21
to Plaintiff’s voluntary promotion to [a] management position which did not offer that benefit[.]” Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the following. Three men C.D. did not recognize forced their way into C.D.’s apartment and stole marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193387 - 2017-09-21
to the following. Three men C.D. did not recognize forced their way into C.D.’s apartment and stole marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193387 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
he ran to his car and only after feeling that his gun was warm did he realize that his gun had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108920 - 2014-03-10
he ran to his car and only after feeling that his gun was warm did he realize that his gun had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108920 - 2014-03-10
Jonathan Snapp v. Jessie Jean-Claude, M.D.
Snapp’s injuries, we conclude that the trial court did not err in granting Dr. Jean-Claude’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20970 - 2006-01-17
Snapp’s injuries, we conclude that the trial court did not err in granting Dr. Jean-Claude’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20970 - 2006-01-17