Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7311 - 7320 of 63957 for records.
Search results 7311 - 7320 of 63957 for records.
State v. Michael P. Thompson
, rather than probation, case. The trial court denied the motion, and upon reviewing the record, also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5266 - 2005-03-31
, rather than probation, case. The trial court denied the motion, and upon reviewing the record, also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5266 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not provide any proof that he mailed the request for a hearing. There is simply nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142621 - 2015-06-02
not provide any proof that he mailed the request for a hearing. There is simply nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142621 - 2015-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21. After our independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282384 - 2020-09-01
809.21. After our independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282384 - 2020-09-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of her right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995116 - 2025-08-13
of her right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995116 - 2025-08-13
State v. Thomas J. Becker
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10497 - 2005-03-31
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10497 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas J. Becker
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10494 - 2005-03-31
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Leggett has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176948 - 2017-09-21
. Leggett has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176948 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143207 - 2015-06-14
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143207 - 2015-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356916 - 2021-04-20
a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356916 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732084 - 2023-11-22
postconviction motions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732084 - 2023-11-22