Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73241 - 73250 of 77380 for judgment for u s.
Search results 73241 - 73250 of 77380 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Recommended for publication in the official reports. [1] The judgment of conviction lists a $250.00 DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51064 - 2010-08-09
. Recommended for publication in the official reports. [1] The judgment of conviction lists a $250.00 DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51064 - 2010-08-09
State v. Thomas H. Richmond
affirmed the trial court's judgment, and rejected as being without merit the claim that Richmond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8816 - 2005-03-31
affirmed the trial court's judgment, and rejected as being without merit the claim that Richmond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8816 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101120 - 2017-09-21
discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174214 - 2017-09-21
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174214 - 2017-09-21
Gregory K. Scott v.
in a disorderly conduct charge that ultimately was dismissed, and did not respond to civil judgments entered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16846 - 2005-03-31
in a disorderly conduct charge that ultimately was dismissed, and did not respond to civil judgments entered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095038 - 2026-03-24
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095038 - 2026-03-24
[PDF]
State v. Michael K. Stavlo
order or judgment contemplated). 2 Stavlo did not appeal that disposition. NO. 96-1017-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10660 - 2017-09-20
order or judgment contemplated). 2 Stavlo did not appeal that disposition. NO. 96-1017-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10660 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
for the caption, and there was a final judgment in the previous filing. See Northern States Power Co. v. Bugher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105426 - 2013-12-09
for the caption, and there was a final judgment in the previous filing. See Northern States Power Co. v. Bugher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105426 - 2013-12-09
Patrick A. Baugh v. Michael J. Sullivan
the agency’s will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12739 - 2005-03-31
the agency’s will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12739 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142723 - 2015-06-01
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142723 - 2015-06-01