Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7341 - 7350 of 30108 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] Dennis Taff v. Town of Burke
, which we decide de novo. Lucas v. Godfrey, 161 Wis. 2d 51, 57, 467 N.W.2d 180 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4045 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
contract is a question of law that we review de novo. When terms of a contract are plain and unambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38151 - 2009-07-22

State v. Pierre Davis
is a question of law which we address de novo. State v. Willis, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9668 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of River Falls v. Jamie T. Kjos
). This is a constitutional fact this court reviews de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14929 - 2017-09-21

State v. Stephan E. Yoder, Jr.
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Swatek, 178 Wis.2d 1, 5, 502 N.W.2d 909, 911 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8812 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation,” which is a question of law we review de novo. Butzlaff v. DHFS, 223 Wis. 2d 673, 679, 590 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101759 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. ¶4 The known and compelling danger exception does not apply in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47140 - 2010-02-16

COURT OF APPEALS
. The final judgment included the taxation of costs in the amount of $966.03. ¶4 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60001 - 2011-02-15

[PDF] Kathy Davis v. Jodine Deppisch
committee is de novo and is limited to the record created before the committee. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21463 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134435 - 2015-02-02