Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7351 - 7360 of 63957 for records.
Search results 7351 - 7360 of 63957 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253619 - 2020-02-12
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253619 - 2020-02-12
James R. Marucha v. Emery Cipov
to a neighboring lot owner, James Marucha. Cipov argues that the record fails to support Marucha's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14106 - 2005-03-31
to a neighboring lot owner, James Marucha. Cipov argues that the record fails to support Marucha's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14106 - 2005-03-31
Arcadia Financial, Ltd. v. Susannah Q. Carey
to Arcadia. We reverse. ¶2 The only issue on this appeal is whether the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2102 - 2005-03-31
to Arcadia. We reverse. ¶2 The only issue on this appeal is whether the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, supplemental submissions, and the record, we dismiss this appeal as moot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160120 - 2017-09-21
, supplemental submissions, and the record, we dismiss this appeal as moot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2017AP849-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205744 - 2017-12-20
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2017AP849-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205744 - 2017-12-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847797 - 2024-09-10
right to file a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847797 - 2024-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
at the time of taking the plea. Id. at 269. Because the record shows Baugh was misinformed about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36086 - 2009-04-06
at the time of taking the plea. Id. at 269. Because the record shows Baugh was misinformed about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36086 - 2009-04-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1967). Matthews filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Matthews
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219298 - 2018-09-19
(1967). Matthews filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Matthews
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219298 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1085-CRNM 2 record and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1085-CRNM 2 record and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97968 - 2014-09-15
this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97968 - 2014-09-15